Prediction of Mitchell Krueger vs Alexander Babanine Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Krueger vs A. Babanine

Mitchell Krueger
USA
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
31
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
202
C. Rank
Ret.
135
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.1M
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Alexander Babanine
AUS
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
31
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
202
C. Rank
Ret.
135
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.1M
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Babanine
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mitchell Krueger winning 2 and Alexander Babanine winning 0. The last match between Mitchell Krueger and Alexander Babanine was at the Australia F9, 10-11-2014, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Krueger | 1 |
| Babanine | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Australia F9(11-10-14)
Mitchell Krueger
6
6
Alexander Babanine
2
3
M. Krueger vs A. Babanine H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,082,108 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.62% (452-407) | Career Total W/L | 50.00% (73-73) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 10 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 25.00% (1-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Krueger vs A. Babanine Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mitchell Krueger has won 46.26% of points on their second serve, while Alexander Babanine has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mitchell Krueger, in recent form, has won 45.71% of their opponent's second serve points, while Alexander Babanine has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.94% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mitchell Krueger has saved 57.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Alexander Babanine has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mitchell Krueger has won 47.54% of matches played (W/L 29/32), with Alexander Babanine winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mitchell Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 124/97), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 10/18). Alexander Babanine has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 18/17), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 53/54).
- Player level: In the last year, Mitchell Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.26% of matches (W/L 21/17), where as Alexander Babanine has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mitchell Krueger winning 1 times and Alexander Babanine being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mitchell Krueger winning 2 and Alexander Babanine winning 0.
- The last match between Mitchell Krueger and Alexander Babanine was at the Australia F9, 10-11-2014, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mitchell Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 265.25 while Alexander Babanine has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mitchell Krueger has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Alexander Babanine has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mitchell Krueger has converted 31.06% of breakpoint opportunities, and Alexander Babanine has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mitchell Krueger vs Alexander Babanine Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Krueger vs A. Babanine H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Krueger 50%, Babanine 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Krueger 50%, Babanine 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Krueger 61%, Babanine 0%.
M. Krueger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
F | W | 6-7(2) 6-4 6-1 | ||
SF | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
QF | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
A. Babanine Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Q2 | L | 7-6(6) 7-6(1) | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6(6) 6-1 | ||

M. Krueger vs A. Babanine Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.62% (452/407) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (73/73) |
| 52.67% (1067/959) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.15% (162/161) |
| 51.10% (9910/9485) | Games Win/Loss | 50.68% (1491/1451) |
| 53.56% (278/241) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.53% (53/54) |
| 56.11% (124/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.43% (18/17) |
| 43.96% (40/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 35.71% (10/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 3016 | Aces Total | 115 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1732 | Total Double Faults | 122 |
| 1:24:12 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 535.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 327.96 |
| 62% (31103/50222) | 1st Serve % | 64% (1997/3104) |
| 69% (21515/31103) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1248/1997) |
| 51% (9698/19119) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (529/1107) |
| 41% (1884/4584) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (146/299) |
| 38% (19471/50786) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1263/3134) |
| 46.03% (29/34) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36.36% (12/21) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.00% (36/39) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49.70% (248/251) | Challenger W/L | 45.45% (10/12) |
| 67.20% (127/62) | Futures W/L | 50.81% (63/61) |
| 52% (441/842) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (73/146) |
| 55% (6/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (134/295) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (14/29) |
| 45% (136/299) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (15/31) |
| 81% (459/374) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (73/66) |
| 19% (459/85) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (73/7) |
| 19% (400/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (73/7) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction09:40 PM 15/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Ignacio Buse vs Roman Andres Burruchaga Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
15 Nov 2025
Kaja Juvan vs Sahaja Yamalapalli Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group G – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
17:45
H2H 0-0
17:50
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico